What Happened to Dance?

Authors

  • Andreea Novac National Center for Dance, Bucharest, Romania

Keywords:

body, movement, dance, kinaesthesia, modern and post-modern dance, contemporary choreography

Abstract

Dance is the art of movement. Contemporary choreography is concerned with dance making in an ever-expanding field: shifting environments, circumstances, and perspectives. As the traditional understanding of dance is questioned by new concerns and innovative practices, the new artistic strategies challenge the very specificities of dance (how we know it or how it is perceived by general audience) and affect, in return, the body, the dance, the practice of choreography and the experience of the viewers. In the present article I explore the transformations the occurred in the understanding of the body-movement bind with echoes in making, performing and reception of dance. I will refer only to the Western contemporary dance (Europe and USA), from beginning of the 20st century to the present day.

References

Banes, S. (1987). Terpsichore in Sneakers. Post-Modern Dance. Middletown, Connecticut: Wesleyan University Press.

Bauer, U. (2008). The Movement of Embodied Thought. The Representation Game of the Stage Zero of Signification in Jérôme Bel. Performance Research 13(1), 1-4.

Birdwhistell, R. L. (2010). Kinesics in Context: Essays in Body Notion Communicatios. University of Pennsylvania Press.

Cohen Bull, C. J. (1997). Sense, Meaning and Perception in Three Dance Cultures. In Desmond, J. C. (Ed.). Meaning in Motion: New Cultural Studies of Dance. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

Cunningham, M. (2002). You have to love dancing to stick to it. In Huxley, M., Witts, N. (Eds.). The Twentieth-Century Performance Reader. 2nd edition. New York: Routledge Press.

Cvejic, B. (2015). Choreographing Problems. Expressive Concepts in European Contemporary Dance and Performance. Hampshire and NY: Palgrave Macmillan Publishers Limited.

Desmond, C J. (Ed.). (1997). Meaning in Motion: New Cultural Studies of Dance. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

Foster, S. L. (2002). Choreographig history. In Huxley, M., Witts, N. (Eds.). The Twentieth-Century Performance Reader. 2nd edition. New York: Routledge Press.

Huxley, M., Witts, N. (Eds.). (2002). The Twentieth - Century Performance Reader. 2nd edition. New York: Routledge Press.

Lepecki, A. (2006). Exhausting Dance. Performance and the politics of movement. New York: Routledge Press.

Lepecki, A. (Ed.). (2004). Of the Presence. Of the Body. Essays on Dance and Performance Theory. Middletown, Connecticut: Wesleyan University Press.

Lepecki, A. (Ed.). (2012). Dance. Documents on Contemporary Art. Cambridge Massachusetts and London: Whitechapel Gallery and The MIT Press.

Manchev, B. (2012). Transformance: The Body of Event/2006. In Lepecki, A. (Ed.). Dance. Documents on Contemporary Art. Cambridge Massachusetts and London: Whitechapel Gallery and The MIT Press.

Martin, J. (2002). Characteristic of the Modern Dance. In Huxley, M., Witts, N. (Eds.). The Twentieth-Century Performance Reader. 2nd edition. New York: Routledge Press.

Martin, J. (1965). The Modern Dance. Princeton, NJ: A Dance Horizons Book Princeton Book Company.

Thomas, H. (2003). The body, Dance and Cultural Theory. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan Publishers Limited.

Turner, B. S. (Ed.) (1991). Recent developments in the theory of the body. SAGE Publications Ltd, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446280546

Wigman, M. (2002). The Philosophy of Modern Dance. In Huxley, M., Witts, N. (Eds.). The Twentieth-Century Performance Reader. 2nd edition. New York: Routledge Press.

Downloads

Published

2021-11-30

How to Cite

Novac, A. (2021). What Happened to Dance?. Doctoral Horizons, 2(1), 13–21. Retrieved from https://doctoral-horizons.unatcpress.ro/index.php/Journal/article/view/29